May 23, 2013
Recent London Attacks in the Media

So I thought I should write a post about the recent murder in London. I really decided to write a post because the story is becoming extremely racialised i.e. the story is becoming centered firmly around that the perpetrators race/religion was main factor in the incident. I basically write this regarding how the media will cover this;

- Firstly, race/religion was not a factor in this killing (I say it like I know this, but it’s quite plainly obvious), rather factors like socio-economic status, mindsets and upbringing are a much more deciding factor. The media however, will indicate very strongly that it was, via such techniques but not limited to; mentioning their quotes, in a religious context, “We swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you.” If such crime took place by someone of Catholic background, the media wouldn’t draw attention to the use of the word “god”.

- Secondly, the language used by the media will attempt to separate them from moral humans, using such words as (but again not limited too); animals, savage, brutal, butcher(ed). While using the opposite for the victim, such as the presumption that he was a soldier (instilling patriotism, giving the idea that they attacked Britain, when they attacked the victim). There has been no evidence to support that he was a soldier apart from 1. He was (reportedly) wearing a shirt supporting a campaign by the British army and 2. he was “near” an army barracks, although no distance was given to how far away from the barracks he was.

- Thirdly, religious leaders will make public announcements condemning these attacks. They may think they’re helping the Muslim community, when in actual fact, they’re harming it. By condemning these attacks, they’re accepting that there is a correlation between race and attack, of which there is none at all. They will also attempt to distance themselves and the Muslim community from these people.

- Fourth and lastly, they call these attacks, “Acts of terrorism”. This can’t be disproved, and why? Because the words “terrorism, terrorist” have to definite meaning, basically constructs of the media, being used as they please. The only requirements to be labelled a terrorist are; a cause that the crime is being committed for (typically political). The label “Terrorist” is typically only ever used by the media in conjunction with people of middle eastern appearance. I do note how the Prime Minister was the first person to mention this; a prime example of how media affects peoples judgement.

All this was, were two people, very possibly mentally ill that decided killing a person in public would make a political statement. Their race had nothing to do with it, although the media will make you think so.

May 20, 2013
Resistance is futile.

May 16, 2013
So now it’s not “gene disorder”

It’s ‘something similar to what Angelina Jolie had,’ well, at least that’s what ninemsn.com reports it as.

I enjoy how a topic as “serious” as this can still relate to Hollywood.

Well done ninemsn.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2013/05/16/08/34/gold-coast-sisters-speak-of-family-cancer-heartbreak

1:30pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZvjgLul5AvKF
Filed under: Gene Disorder ninemsn 
May 13, 2013
Sapphires soliloquy.: It’s always been a dream, but after todays exams, that I’ve fucked up,...

todieisbutthegreatestadventure:

It’s always been a dream, but after todays exams, that I’ve fucked up, I no longer wish to go to university and study History. I instead wish to travel around the country with my ukeulele, never staying in one place long enough to make good friends but instead meeting new people doing exciting new…

That sounds amazing! In your eyes, I’m a random, and so my opinion isn’t of much value, roughly equal to that of an unsuable penny. But I employ you to do that! Your life sounds like it’d be so, free. From most constraints of life.

May 10, 2013
The Five (Fox News Channel)

‘We [the media] should leave them [the three kidnapped in Ohio] alone’

Adbreak - ‘Tomorrow, catch the exclusive interview about the women’s stories and how they escaped!’

Don’t stick too close to your word Fox

May 9, 2013
Ever notice those - “How well do you know your partner(s)?”

There’s one on television now, in the background. And all they ask are trivial questions, “How did you two meet?” “What’s their favourite movie?” Etc.

I guess I really shouldn’t be taking this that seriously, but anywhere you see, quizzes about how well you know your partner(s) are all trivial. Shouldn’t it be about things deeper? Like, mannerism? Or habits, personality traits. Values or ideals?

May 9, 2013
Tell Me if I’m Wrong

thisiswhatatheismlookslike:

The best feeling in life is to be proven wrong because it frees you from having a wrong idea.

Some people think they are too smart, however, that they don’t want to be told that they are. If you are one of them, you sir, are a complete idiot.

May 7, 2013
Nobody knows that they saw it, but they did. - A nice, big, cock.

Nobody knows that they saw it, but they did. - A nice, big, cock.

11:23pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZvjgLukRU5B_
Filed under: Fight Club Not Subliminal Cock 
May 7, 2013
swallow-white-pills:

thepainhurts17:

es-ca-pe—me:

t-o-r-n—a-p-a-r-t:

indiiyousahindie:

too-young-for-depression:

k-illmyself:

:’(

This saved me.

probably most powerful gif on tumblr.

I stared at this for so long.



hashtag this is Tyler the Creator just sayin

^That comment was beyond necessary.

swallow-white-pills:

thepainhurts17:

es-ca-pe—me:

t-o-r-n—a-p-a-r-t:

indiiyousahindie:

too-young-for-depression:

k-illmyself:

:’(

This saved me.

probably most powerful gif on tumblr.

I stared at this for so long.

hashtag this is Tyler the Creator just sayin

^That comment was beyond necessary.

(via trippinginthemoment)

May 5, 2013
Which subculture do you identify yourself with?

A friend asked me this, and I thought about it;
I personally don’t want to involve myself in a particular subculture. I think of identifying yourself with a subculture, such as punk, is to basically wear a uniform. You believe, act and dress the way of the subculture rarely because of you agree with all it’s ideals, instead because it’s fashionable or to fit in.
Myself; I take ideals from different subcultures that I agree with, namely anarchism/nihilism/minimalism. The subculture I am a part of, is me.
(yes I know my blog title contradicts it, I’m meant to get around to changing that!)

May 2, 2013
: #INeedMasculismBecause

anarchist-vs-themachine:

So I’ve been reading a fair bit about this whole “#INeedMasculismBecause” tag on twitter, how it started on 4chan as a parody to the feminism tag saying and found it’s way to Twitter where people in a way parodied the parody. Possibly, I’m not too clear on that.

I have to admit, your post makes a lot of sense. Thankyou. These are the kind of arguments that change my stance on a subject. Which it has, I never thought about the ways feminism can affect males as well, i.e. custodial rights.

May 1, 2013
Rap. Fight. Learn.: Ellen moments that would not fly with reversed genders

sweep-pass-submit:

Just want to point out a few moments from Ellen that I am pretty certain would not make it to air if the genders were reversed.

The first one can be seen near the end of this video. A sexy man is modelling a pair of boxer of briefs on a rotating stage. Ellen gets onto the stage and gets into a…

May 1, 2013
#INeedMasculismBecause

So I’ve been reading a fair bit about this whole “#INeedMasculismBecause” tag on twitter, how it started on 4chan as a parody to the feminism tag saying and found it’s way to Twitter where people in a way parodied the parody. Possibly, I’m not too clear on that.

(Please take note that I use the word ‘masculism’ as pretty much the same as the word ‘feminism,’ just for the opposite gender, not in reference to male superiority)

But come to think of it, there’s serious problems - and the majority of people using the tag appear to be feminists. Or so I find (if you search the ‘INeedMasculismBecause’ tag on tumblr, you’ll find most users are proud feminists.)

Now, I’m not attacking feminists. I admit, there’s a lot more inequality for women in society than there is for men. But there is for men, Including not limited too;

- Custody rights

- Image in mainstream society that they are more violent, which I’m not saying isn’t true, but in the majority of court cases this public conception of the violent strong male usually works against their favour, warranting harsher penalties than females

- Discrimination in the health department; many male diseases are over shadowed by namely - breast cancer, I’m not shunning the advocacy of breast cancer. But there are many male diseases that aren’t well advocated; prostate cancer, isn’t as much, although it is becoming more common place now in society. ‘Alport Syndrome,’ it affects both sexes, but affects males much more severely. That and mental health, although this is becoming more commonplace in the media - there still is a wide belief that men shouldn’t cry, don’t get depressed, “Man up!” “Grow some balls,” “Don’t be a pussy/wimp.” This belief is held by both genders, but, it’s still a misconception

- Lastly, this one has been used a bit, but it doesn’t make it any less true - violence against men, this includes but isn’t limited too; rape and domestic violence. Now I’m definitely not saying women commit more crimes, the statistics are out on that, way more many men commit this kind of stuff. But things like that do happen. Just because a male is usually physically stronger than a female, doesn’t make it alright - and to add to that, there are many things a female can do to, such as attack not only with just her body, but with weapons; knives, bats, blunt instruments, guns - I mean, get a male fighting a women with a bat, the guy’s going to get pretty dinged up. Then there’s the whole perception with retaliation, that’s favoured toward females. And then there’s the whole thing with rape, it does happen with men. Namely, not anywhere near, but it still does. But then most people laugh it off, “You could’ve over powered her.” “You wanted it, it felt good didn’t it?” Feminists say rape is never funny, then they go and mock masculism.

I realise there’s probably a better word for masculism, but, that’s not what this post is based around.

I’m the point that even though men don’t face as many problems as women, they still do, and somehow people, a majority of them feminist’s make fun of it, it’s like their almost rejecting their selves. It’s pretty much like men making a joke of the #INeedFeminismBecause tag, if guys did, “Oh fuck no! take this seriously, women aren’t equal.” It doesn’t matter about how many inequalities there are in each sex, it just matters if there are. And there are.

This is why sometimes I say I don’t overly like feminism.

P.s. I’m not saying feminists take the piss out of the tag, I’m saying the people who take the piss of out the tag are feminists (mostly, look through tumblr).

May 1, 2013

Anonymous asked: with an attitude like "fuck yourself" you're not going to go too far at university. You want to implement your own ideas? that's great, you'll need to study everyone else's before anyone starts taking yours seriously. its not until third/forth year you'll even be MAYBE able to start to put your own ideas into your work & it'll depend on the unit/lecturer. if you want to be a teacher, not a lot of your own ideas will be going into those assessments pieces at uni. good luck, YOU will need it.

Why not? Naming my anonymous blog ‘fuck yourself,’ hardly constitutes as a bad attitude.
And on the note of implementing my own ideas, you may of taken that too seriously. Or maybe not enough.
To clarify, what I mean by implementing my own ideas (I’m not watering this down to make this message appear less, well correct), I mean by implementing my own beliefs for activities and learning. I don’t mean their development of mathematics and english and other essential skills. I mean to make them more aware, critical thinking. Independent thought, etc.
Fuck, that might be directly affecting their major development. I honestly don’t know.
And for that, thankyou. Honestly. Most anonymous questions are saying fuck you, or are really bad at pointing flaws out.
But you, you’re actually critical in a helpful way, like Brandy being critical of Stevo in ‘SLC Punks.’
And instead of being a narcissistic fuck and saying “eat my cunt!,” I’m strangely attracted to you.
So, truly honestly.
Thankyou.

April 30, 2013
You have no meaning.

Reading ‘Survivor’ by Chuck Palahniuk, the author of ‘Fight Club,’ I find myself creating a post in third person.
But this book got me thinking, what’s the point to life? (I think ‘point’ makes the idea clearer than ‘meaning’)
I mean,
- Is it to make people around you happy? They’re going to die someday.
- Make a contribution to humanity/society? It’s going to end eventually.
Even if you become supremely famous, add unbeknownst information to humanity.
Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein - as great as they are, the amount they’ve contributed to the progress of humanity. There’s no point.
It will all end, it’s just a matter of ‘will what I did last for a year? Or a thousand?’
I imagine that’s why religions promise eternal life after death. It’s such an indulgence to believe there is a point to life.
Making religion a welcoming idea to those uncomfortable with the idea they have no point in life.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »